The degree of crosstalk observed in signaling networks varies widely
across evolution. In eukaryotes, crosstalk is widespread, with some
kinases and phosphatases acting on hundreds of downstream targets. In
bacteria, however, signaling pathways are often completely isolated
from one another.  It is currently unclear exactly what pressures have
driven the evolution of these vastly different topologies.  The basic
"building block" of eukaryotic signaling networks is a pair of
enzymes, one that modifies a substrate (e.g. a kinase) and one that
undoes this modification (e.g. a phosphatase).  We have used
mathematical models to show that adding crosstalk to this type of
system can increase ultrasensitivity and couple signal responses,
behaviors that could yield phenotypic benefits for eukaryotic cells.
In contrast, bacterial networks utilize Two-Component Signaling (TCS),
in which a single enzyme (the sensor Histidine Kinase, or HK) acts as
both kinase and phosphatase for its downstream Response Regulator
(RR).  We found that crosstalk always reduces signal response in TCS,
which likely underlies the dramatic decrease in fitness that has been
observed experimentally when crosstalk is engineered into bacterial
cells.  Our work thus indicates that the different topologies of
eukaryotic and bacterial signaling networks likely arise from
fundamental differences in the biochemistry of the basic motifs from
which the networks themselves are constructed.  We have also found
that differences in network topology can have a profound impact on the
evolvability of intracellular communication, which may provide an
evolutionary rationale for the incredible complexity of metazoan
signaling systems.